|
Home progress concept photos videos rigs questionnaire feedback background adaptive foils glossary Concept Boat competition windships windsurfing version canoe/kayak rig
| |
| Model-making is a time-honoured, effective way of investigating
problems. Often things are not quite as you might imagine, and models soon indicate where
your understanding is based on shaky foundations! By making model flappers, for example, I
discovered quite early on that there is no need to power the upstroke - lifting forces are
quite capable of bringing the wings back up ready for the next downstroke. Now this can
create a problem if you are using familiar power sources such as twisted rubber, which has
an even power output: how can you put more power into one part of the flapping cycle than
another? I found the simplest way to put more energy into the downstroke
was to tension the wings in the down position. By experimentation, the result is a slow
upstroke with a build up of resistance in the tensioners, followed by a more vigorous
downstroke. This simple adaptation leads immediately to a more realistic flapping motion.
A second important point is that the wing on the downstroke must either rotate
bodily into a more leading-edge-down position (ie: negative angle of attack), or the wing
membrane itself must be flexible enough to twist into this new position. The best way is
to pivot the wing root so that it is able to rotate appropriately, and then tension it
back into the positive angle of attack position. During the powered downstroke, the
torsional effect of having the centre of effort of the wing behind the pivot axis causes
the wing to tilt into a nose down position until the upstroke begins.
These two factors can make a lot of difference to the success or otherwise of
flapping wing models! |
|
 |
A rubber-powered model emulating insect flight
(1982) |
|
 |
Rubber powered model with articulated fuselage
(1999). Click on the thumbnails below for enlarged images. |
|

general view, 64 K
|

structure of the wing, 25 K
|

beginning of upstroke, 62 K
|
|
detail of wing root, 36 K
|

incidence changes of wings, 27K
|

detail of crank, 20 K
|
|
|
|
To see a proposal
for a human-powered ornithopter using the principles derived from model
ornithopters, click here |
[ Home ] [ Up ] [ wings compared ] [ insect flight ] [ bat flight ] [ bird flight ] [ evolution of flight ] [ flapping flight ] [ ornithopters ] |